The Vegan Awareness Foundation requires that products approved to carry the Certified Vegan Logo must: not contain meat, fish, fowl, animal by-products (including silk or dyes from insects), eggs or egg products, milk or milk products, honey or honey bee products; involve no animal testing of ingredients or finished product by supplier, producer, manufacturer or independent party; provide supplier verification that animal products were not used in the manufacturing of ingredients; contain no known animal-derived GMOs or genes used to manufacture ingredients or finished products.
How vegan beauty brands can be effective and animal-free
Some standard ingredient testing methods involve enzymes or antibodies derived from animals. Dr Jan Knight explains how vegan beauty brands can test the antioxidant capacity of cosmetic and toiletry products and their ingredients without compromising on their ideals
You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.
Click here to find out more.
You may also like
Trending Articles
-
You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more. -
You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.
You may also like
You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.
Click here to find out more.
Regulatory
Why true trust in beauty requires more than self-certification
Consumer trust is a business imperative for beauty brands vying for loyal customers. Yet in a marketplace where transparency is prized, too many brands are still relying on self-certification to make claims their customers increasingly question
You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.
Click here to find out more.
You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.
Click here to find out more.
Regulatory
Analysis: What’s the future for SPF after Australia’s testing scandal?
Consumer trust in SPF has taken a hit, and innovation could be stifled after dozens of sunscreens were found to be offering less protection than promised in Australia. But new testing methods could be adopted more swiftly, too