Silicones have shaped the texture of modern beauty.
They make creams glide, primers blur, hair serums shine, sunscreens spread evenly and colour cosmetics feel lighter than their pigment load suggests.
For years, they were the quiet performance engine behind ‘premium feel’.
Tickets are now available for the 25th anniversary of the Pure Beauty Awards, taking place on 15 October 2026 at the Grosvenor House Hotel in London, UK. Join the beauty industry for an evening of recognition and celebration as this year’s winners are revealed. Click here to secure your place.
The new question for brands is no longer whether silicones work – they do.
The question is whether the next generation of beauty can achieve the same sensory standard with ingredients that better match today’s expectations on sustainability and transparency as well as regulatory resilience.
This is why natural silicone alternatives are moving from niche claim to strategic formulation priority.
In Europe, the regulatory signal is clear: D5 and D6 will be restricted above 0.1% in all cosmetic products from June 2027, including leave-on products [1].
This does not mean every silicone disappears from beauty, but it does change the risk calculation for brands.
It pushes product developers to ask whether they want to reformulate reactively, ingredient by ingredient, or proactively build new sensory systems less exposed to future scrutiny.
Natural selection
The trend is also commercial. The global natural personal care ingredients market was valued at US$5.3bn in 2023 and is projected to reach $7.9bn by 2028, growing at 8.3% CAGR [2], according to MarketsandMarkets.